The Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, AB 939, requires local governments to prepare plans and implement programs to achieve 50% waste reduction by the year 2000. AB 2494, passed in 1992, refined and standardized methodologies to measure and report waste disposal reduction via a jurisdiction’s Annual Report. AB 75, passed in 1999, requires state agencies to meet a waste diversion goal of 50% by 2004 and to document efforts in meeting these goals. In 2001, the state’s Integrated Waste Management Board established as one of seven strategic goals, the promotion of a “zero-waste” California. State agencies must meet recycled content procurement goals in 12 product categories with varying minimum content levels specified.
Archive for January, 2007
EPA Integrated Waste Management Act
Tuesday, January 30th, 2007Majority of Recyclable Plastic Heads to Landfills
Monday, January 29th, 2007The demand for recycled plastics has never been higher. But even the 1 billion pounds of PET plastic bottles and 1 billion pounds of high density polyethylene containers recycled annually in the United States, based on 2004 data, are not enough.
It’s also just a fraction of what the market could be, as another 3.6 billion pounds of PET bottles are not recycled and a lot of recycled plastic heads toward export markets in China.
“We think the unrestricted demand for PET could be 2 [billion] to 2.5 billion pounds,” said Dave Cornell, technical director for the Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers in Washington. “The industry also could use another 500 million pounds of HDPE, if it could get it.”
“The main issue is the lack of supply,” said Judith Dunbar, director of environmental and technical issues for the American Plastics Council in Arlington, Va. “There is a lot of domestic competition, and the export market is competing for that tight supply as well,” with estimates that in just one category, PET bottles, a third of recycled bottles are shipped overseas.
As a result, PET recyclers are operating at just 67 percent capacity and HDPE recyclers at 70 percent capacity, Dunbar said.
“There has been a decline of between 3 and 4 percent in the amount of material available to recyclers since 2001,” said Scott Saunders, director of raw material procurement and sales at KW Plastics in Troy, Ala. “And prices have gone up 100 percent in the past 24 months. The market could grow 100 to 200 percent without affecting the downstream market’s ability to absorb that material.
“We have customers who would like to buy more material from us, and it’s not available, and we have potential new customers who want material, but the supply has been stagnant. No recycling company can grow without an increase of supply,” he said.
But even if all the plastic containers exported were diverted back to the United States, that would be just an incremental gain. And if recycling rates rebounded to their near 40 percent level of the mid-1990s, that would help, but it would still leave more than 60 percent of plastic containers unrecycled and disposed of in one fashion or another.
“We are holding back the growth of companies in North Carolina” and across the U.S. “because we throw bottles in landfills,” said Scott Mouw, section chief at the North Carolina Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance.
PET bottle recycling is a good example. Recycling rates reached a peak of 37.5 percent in 1994 but then steadily declined, dropping below 20 percent, before rebounding slightly to 21.6 percent in 2004, according to the National Association for PET Container Resources in Sonoma, Calif.
In 2004, the amount of recycled PET bottles by weight, slightly more than 1 billion pounds, was less than the amount discarded in 1994. And the amount of plastic bottles discarded in 2004, by weight, was 3.62 billion – or 3½ times the 1.07 billion pounds discarded in 1994, NAPCOR said.
The recycling decline isn’t unique to plastic, as almost all recycled products have been on a similar trend. “The recycling rates for plastic, glass and aluminum have all declined,” said Pat Franklin, executive director of the Container Recycling Institute in Washington.
As Garth Hickle, team leader for the Product Stewardship Team in the Minnesota Office of Environment Assistance, explained: “The cost of disposal is relatively inexpensive in the United States. Recycling is just another household activity in everyone’s busy schedule, which makes it hard for it to be a priority, and companies are not providing enough opportunities for consumers to recycle when they are away from home.”
Yet working to find a better way to recycle plastics or solutions to the supply shortage has long been a contentious issue, with each vested interest typically pushing its own agenda instead of working together.
But some in the industry are hopeful that economics – that is, the high cost of oil, changes in recycling methods, and some promising initiatives to encourage more recycling – could bring more supply to the market.
North Carolina’s Mouw points to the growth of single-stream recycling that allows all recycled goods to be collected at the same time, the growth of automatic, optical sorting equipment at material recovery facilities and more interest in single-bottle collection systems for plastics, rather than collection by plastic type.
“In an atmosphere of $70 per barrel for oil, more recycling should be a no-brainer,” said Dennis Sabourin, NAPCOR executive director. “Individually and together, we have to look at innovative ways of increasing the recycling stream of materials.
APC’s Dunbar agreed: “Single-stream recycling is becoming the big thing and has a lot of potential to capture … about 10 to 20 percent more out of the waste stream.”
In addition, a number of private and government recycling initiatives have encouraged Tamsin Ettefagh, vice president of sales and purchasing at Envision Plastics Inc.
Ettefagh said reverse vending machines and the Recycle Bank program are helpful for away-from-home recycling. Reverse vending machines allow people to return recyclables for incentive coupons from merchandisers. At Recycle Bank, recyclables are placed in a single box for pickup and consumers receive RB dollars to spend at participating merchants.
She also points to pay-as-you-throw programs in more than 6,000 cities where consumers are charged by weight or bag to dispose of waste.
“Pay-as-you-throw programs tend to have a 50 percent recycling recovery rate vs. a national average of 25 percent,” Ettefagh said.
In addition to private and municipal initiatives, government mandates are moving forward in an effort to reduce waste.
Yet they are bitterly opposed by many. For example, the two main soft drink companies, PepsiCo of Purchase, N.Y., and Coca-Cola Co. of Atlanta, spend millions of dollars annually to fight bottle-deposit bills, which exist in only 11 states. Since 1986, only one has passed, in Hawaii.
Verespej is a reporter for Crain Communications’ Plastics News.
SOURCE: Mike Verespej Plastics News












